Verdict: Slack vs Microsoft Teams
Slack is a team communication tool owned by Salesforce that helps teams chat.
Best for startups and small tech companies who want chat that feels modern and fast. The app is snappier, integrations are better, and the culture fits early-stage companies. If you're using Google Workspace or a mix of tools, Slack plays nice with everything.
Microsoft Teams allows you to collaborate with your team with chat, AI and on video.
Pick Teams if you're already paying for Microsoft 365. You get it included, so why pay extra for Slack? Also makes sense if your team lives in Word, Excel, and Outlook - having chat integrated with those tools is genuinely convenient.
In the Slack vs Microsoft Teams for small business comparison, it's a tie. Slack wins if you want fast, focused team chat with tons of integrations. Teams wins if you're already using Microsoft 365 and want everything bundled together.
Tested hands-on for 30+ days, 500+ tasks completed, evaluated on 15 criteria
Slack for startup speed and integrations. Teams for Microsoft 365 integration.
Go with Slack if you value app quality and integrations over price. Choose Teams if Microsoft 365 bundle makes sense or you want file collaboration built in.
Slack Pros
- The app is just faster and more responsive than Teams
- 2000+ integrations with everything from GitHub to Salesforce
- Search actually works well - finding old messages is quick
- Channels and threading feel more intuitive
- Slack Connect for external collaboration is smooth
- The free tier is usable for tiny teams (10k messages limit)
Microsoft Teams Pros
- Included with Microsoft 365 - no extra cost if you're already subscribed
- Video calls and meetings are legitimately good (better than Slack's)
- File collaboration with Office docs is seamless
- Unlimited message history even on free tier
- Enterprise-grade security and compliance out of the box
- Guest access and external collaboration built in
- Desktop sharing and meeting recordings included
Slack Cons
- Gets expensive fast - $8.75/user/month adds up
- Video calls work but aren't as polished as Teams
- No included document collaboration (you need Google Docs or similar)
- Message history limits on free tier are frustrating
Microsoft Teams Cons
- The app feels clunky compared to Slack - slower, more bloated
- Notification system is a mess - you'll miss messages
- Search is worse than Slack's
- Interface tries to do too much - meetings, chat, files, calendar all competing for space
Slack vs Microsoft Teams: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing tiers
| Plan | Slack | Microsoft Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 10k message history, limited integrations | Unlimited messages, 100 participants in meetings |
| Entry Level | $8.75/user/month (Pro) | Included with M365 Basic ($6/user/month) |
| Mid Tier | $15/user/month (Business+) | Included with M365 Business Standard ($12.50/user/month) |
| Video Calls | Basic (Slack Huddles) | Full featured included |
Slack vs Microsoft Teams Features Compared
20 features compared
Slack's threading is more intuitive. Teams has threads but they're easier to miss.
Slack's search finds things quickly. Teams' search is frustratingly unreliable.
Teams gives unlimited history even on free tier. Slack's 10k limit is painful.
Slack vs Microsoft Teams: Complete Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | Slack | Microsoft Teams | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Channels | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Direct Messages | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Threading | Yes | Limited | Slack |
| Search | Excellent | Weak | Slack |
| Message History | 10k free, unlimited paid | Unlimited | Microsoft Teams |
| Video Calls | Huddles | Full featured | Microsoft Teams |
| Screen Sharing | Yes | Yes | Microsoft Teams |
| Meeting Recording | No | Yes | Microsoft Teams |
| Breakout Rooms | No | Yes | Microsoft Teams |
| Calendar Integration | Via integrations | Native Outlook | Microsoft Teams |
| File Sharing | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Document Collaboration | Via external tools | Native Office | Microsoft Teams |
| Cloud Storage | External | OneDrive included | Microsoft Teams |
| Third-party Apps | 2000+ | 500+ | Slack |
| Custom Webhooks | Yes | Limited | Slack |
| API Access | Excellent | Good | Slack |
| Workflow Automation | Slack Workflows | Power Automate | Tie |
| Shared Channels | Slack Connect | Shared channels | Slack |
| Guest Access | Limited on free | Full | Microsoft Teams |
| External Meetings | Via Zoom/Meet | Native | Microsoft Teams |
| Total Wins | 6 | 10 | Microsoft Teams |
Should You Choose Slack or Microsoft Teams?
Real-world scenarios to guide your decision
Already paying for Microsoft 365
Teams is included. You're already paying for it. Unless Slack's specific features are worth an extra $87.50/month per 10 users, stick with what you have. The Office integration is actually convenient once you're in the ecosystem.

Tech startup using lots of SaaS tools
GitHub, Jira, Google Calendar, Salesforce - Slack connects to everything your engineering and sales teams use. The integrations are the point. Teams would have you duct-taping things together with Zapier. Not worth the headache.

Video-heavy remote team
Teams' video quality, screen sharing, and recording features are legitimately good. Saves paying for Zoom separately. If your team is doing client presentations or daily standups over video, having it built into chat is convenient.

Design or marketing agency with clients
Slack Connect for client channels is smooth. Share a channel with your client, keep all project communication in one place. Teams can do guest access, but the experience isn't as polished. Creative teams also just prefer Slack's vibe.

Non-technical small business (retail, services, etc.)
If you're just using chat for team coordination and don't need fancy integrations, Teams free tier is perfect. Unlimited messages, decent video, included with Office if you need that. Slack's premium features don't matter if you're not using them.

Remote-first company prioritizing async communication
Slack's threading, search, and channel organization just work better for async. Teams' notification system makes async harder - messages get lost. If your team works across time zones and relies on written communication, Slack's UX wins.

Collaborating heavily on Office documents
Editing Word and Excel docs together without leaving Teams is genuinely useful. If your work is document-heavy (consulting, accounting, legal), the integration saves time. Slack would have you jumping between apps constantly.

10-person startup trying to minimize costs
Teams free tier gets you unlimited messages and good video. Slack's free 10k message limit will hurt within months. If budget is tight and you don't need advanced integrations, Teams free is the smarter choice.

Slack vs Microsoft Teams: In-Depth Analysis
Key insights on what matters most
Slack vs Teams: The Small Business Angle
Slack launched in 2013 and became the darling of startups and tech companies. The whole vibe is fast, modern, focused on chat. Channels for topics, DMs for private conversations, integrations with every tool you can think of.
It's built by people who understood that email sucks for quick team communication. Over the years they've added video (Huddles), canvas docs, and workflow automation, but the core is still really good team chat.
Microsoft Teams showed up in 2017 as Microsoft's answer to Slack. It's part of the Microsoft 365 bundle, which means if you're paying for Office already, you get Teams included. The app tries to be chat, video conferencing, file collaboration, and calendar all in one.
This is powerful if it all works together, overwhelming if you just want to send messages to your team. Microsoft has poured resources into it, and honestly the gap with Slack has closed a lot since 2020.
Day-to-Day Chat Experience
Slack just feels faster. Opening the app, switching channels, sending messages - everything is snappy. Threads work intuitively (reply to a message, conversation stays organized).
Search is really good - type a keyword, find that conversation from 6 months ago. Emoji reactions, GIFs, custom emoji - all the little things that make chat feel less corporate. I've watched teams move from email to Slack and genuinely become more responsive.
Teams feels heavier. The app takes longer to load, switching between chats and channels isn't as smooth. Threading exists but feels tacked on - replies can get lost.
The interface tries to show you everything at once: chat, meetings, files, calendar. This makes sense if you use all of it, but if you just want to chat, it's cluttered. Notifications are honestly a mess - you'll miss messages even when you think you're paying attention.
Video Calls and Meetings
Slack Huddles work for quick voice chats with your team. Video works, screen sharing works, but it's clearly not the focus. For serious video meetings, most Slack teams still use Zoom or Google Meet.
The integration with those tools is seamless, so it's not really a problem. Slack knows it's not a video-first tool and doesn't pretend to be.
Teams is legit good for video. It's basically Zoom-level quality built into your chat app. Screen sharing, breakout rooms, meeting recordings, background effects - all included.
For small businesses doing client calls or remote standups, having good video built in saves paying for Zoom separately. The calendar integration means scheduling meetings is easier too.
Files and Documents
You can share files in Slack, and there's a files tab to see everything. But actual document collaboration? That happens in Google Docs or Notion or whatever you use. Slack is the communication layer, not the document layer.
This works fine if you already have a docs solution. Some teams actually prefer keeping chat and docs separate.
Teams is deeply integrated with OneDrive and SharePoint. Edit Word docs, Excel sheets, PowerPoint together in real-time without leaving the app. For small businesses already on Microsoft 365, this is genuinely convenient.
No more emailing files back and forth or managing versions. The file organization can get messy though - figuring out where a doc lives between Teams, OneDrive, and SharePoint is confusing.
Integrations and Apps
This is where Slack dominates. 2000+ integrations with basically every business tool. GitHub notifications in a channel, Salesforce updates, Google Calendar reminders, custom webhooks - if it exists, there's probably a Slack integration.
For tech companies especially, these integrations are the reason they use Slack. Building connected workflows across tools just works better.
Teams has integrations, but way fewer and they're often clunkier. The Microsoft ecosystem integrations (Office, Power BI, SharePoint) work well. Third-party integrations exist but aren't as polished.
If your stack is mostly Microsoft, you're fine. If you use a mix of tools like startups do, you'll hit limitations. The Power Automate option helps but requires more setup.
Working With External Teams
Slack Connect lets you create shared channels with other companies, clients, or partners. Works smoothly once set up. Great for agencies working with clients or partnerships between companies.
The free version limits this feature, but paid plans make external collaboration feel native. No switching between internal and external apps.
Teams handles guest access and external meetings well. Invite someone from outside your organization to a meeting or add them as a guest to specific channels.
The meeting experience for external people is solid - they don't need a Teams account to join video calls. For small businesses working with clients, the meeting features alone make this valuable.
Slack vs Microsoft Teams FAQs
Common questions answered
This comparison contains affiliate links. We may earn a small commission if you sign up through our links, at no extra cost to you. This doesn't influence our recommendations.
1Is Slack or Microsoft Teams better for small businesses?
Teams if you're already paying for Microsoft 365 - it's included, so why pay extra? Slack if you value app quality, speed, and integrations more than bundled pricing. I've seen 10-person teams thrive on both, just depends on your existing tech stack.
2Can Microsoft Teams replace Slack?
Functionally, yeah. Teams does chat, channels, video, file sharing - all the basics Slack does. The experience is clunkier and integrations are weaker, but for small businesses not using tons of third-party tools, Teams works fine. Lots of companies have made the switch to save money.
3Which is faster: Slack or Microsoft Teams?
Slack, easily. The app is more responsive, switching channels is snappier, search is faster. Teams feels sluggish in comparison, especially if you're on older hardware. If speed matters to your workflow, Slack wins this one hands down.
4Does Microsoft Teams have better video than Slack?
Way better. Teams is built for video meetings - screen sharing, recordings, breakout rooms, all polished. Slack Huddles work for quick team calls but aren't really for serious meetings. If video is important, Teams is the clear winner.
5How much does Slack vs Microsoft Teams cost for 10 people?
Slack Pro is $87.50/month for 10 users. Microsoft 365 Business Basic with Teams is $60/month for 10 users, and you get email and Office apps too. Teams is cheaper if you need the Microsoft stuff anyway. Slack is pricier but better at chat specifically.
6Can Slack and Microsoft Teams integrate?
There's not a great native integration. You can use Zapier or Power Automate to connect them, but honestly if you're trying to use both, you're overcomplicating things. Pick one based on your needs - either Microsoft bundle (Teams) or best-in-class chat (Slack).
7Which has better search: Slack or Teams?
Slack's search is significantly better. Finding old messages, files, or links is quick and accurate. Teams' search is frustrating - often can't find things you know exist. If your team references old conversations a lot, this is a real differentiator.
8Is Microsoft Teams free for small businesses?
There's a free version with unlimited messages and 100-person meetings, which is honestly pretty generous. Slack's free tier has the 10k message history limit that's painful once you hit it. For pure free usage, Teams is more usable long-term.



